Analysis of the reproductive parameters after intrauterine insemination of sows with semen stored during different time periods

Main Article Content

Slobodanka Vakanjac
Vladimir Magaš
Vladan Babić
Milan Maletić
Spomenka Đurić
Jelena Apić
Milorad Mirilović


Introduction. Artificial insemination of sows with cooled semen has become a routine practice in the swine industry and has almost completely ruled out natural mating. The storage time of the cooled semen and preservation of its qualitative parameters are of the upmost importance and depend partly on the semen extender used. The aim of this study was to determine the quality of cooled semen during storage in a thermobox with a commercial extender by assessment of sperm motility, cytomorphology, and assessment of reproductive parameters in sows after intrauterine insemination.
Materials and Methods. The semen was preserved with Duragen® (Magapor, Spain) extender and stored at 17±1°C. A total of 110 sows were included in the study and randomly divided into four groups: K1 (n=25) , K2 (n=25), K3 (n=30), and K4 (n=30). The sows were inseminated twice with semen (>1x107/ml spermatozoa) which had been stored for 1 day (S1), 3 days (S3), 5 days (S5), or 7 days (S7). Pregnancy was diagnosed by imaging ultrasound.
Results and Conclusions. The best results were obtained when the sows were inseminated with semen stored for one day. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the number and vitality of newborn piglets when semen stored for 3 or 5 days was used. Intrauterine insemination resulted in a satisfactory number of farrowings and piglets despite the fact that a relatively low number of spermatozoa was determined in each dose used. The use of semen with a higher dilution rate and its intrauterine application ensured a larger number of obtained doses from one ejaculate and indicates this would lead to a more profitable use of boars.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vakanjac, S., Magaš, V., Babić, V., Maletić, M., Đurić, S., Apić, J., & Mirilović, M. (2017). Analysis of the reproductive parameters after intrauterine insemination of sows with semen stored during different time periods. Veterinarski Glasnik, 71(2), 98-106.
Full research article


Belstra A.B. 2004. Review; Intrauterine (transcervical) and fixed-time artificial insemination in swine. Swine Reproduction, 3: 1-6. Available at:

Boonkusol D., Saikhun K., Ratanaphumma P. 2010. Effects of extender and storage time on motility and ultrastructure of cooled preserved boar spermatozoa. Kasetsart Journal (Natural Science), 44: 582-589.

Dimitrov S., Jeliazkov E., Levis D. 2007. Deep intrauterine and transcervical insemination of sows and gilts. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 5:40-46.

Gómez R.C., Dahmani Y., García-Tomás M., Mozo-Martín R., Jiménez S., Berges A.C., Grandía J. 2009. Evaluation of extra-long semen extender Duragén: reproductive parameters in sows inseminated with semen give 1, 12 ó 15 days. XXXIX Jornadas de Estudio, XIII Jornadas sobre Producción Animal, Zaragoza, España, 12 y 13 de mayo de 2009, pp. 741-743

Estienne M.J., Harper A.F., Day J.L. 2007. Characteristics of sperm motility in boar semen diluted in different extenders and stored for seven days at degrees 18C. Reproductive Biology, 7:221-231.

Fitzgerald R.F., Gordon F.J., Stalder K.J. 2008. Effects of intrauterine and cervical artificial-insemination catheters on farrowing rate and litter size. Journal of Swine Health and Production, 16:10-15.

Huo L.J., Ma X.H., Yang M.Z. 2002. Assessment of sperm viability, mitochondrial activity, capacitation and acrosome intactness in extender boar semen during long-term storage. Theriogenology, 58:1349-1360.

Johanson L.A., Aalbers J.G., Grooten H.J.G. 1988. Artificial insemination of swine: Fecundity of boar semen stored in Beltsvill TS (BTS), Modified Modena (MM), or MR-A and inseminated on one, three and four days after collection. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 23:49-55. doi/10.1111/j.1439-0531.1988.tb01080.x

Karageorgiou M.A., Tsousis G., Boscos C.M., Tzika E.D., Tassis P.D., Tsakmakidis I.A. 2016. A comparative study of boar semen extenders with different proposed preservation times and their effect on semen quality and fertility. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 85:23-31.

Kruger C., Rath D. 2000. Intrauterine insemination in sows with reduced sperm number. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 12:113-117.

Kuster C.E., Althouse G.C. 1999. The fecundity of porcine semen stored for 2 to 6 days in androhep and X-cellTM extenders. Theriogenology, 52:365-376.

Martinez E.A., Vazquez J.R., Lucas X., Gil M.A., Parrilla I., Vazquez J.L., Day B.N. 2001. Successful non-surgical deep intrauterine insemination with small numbers of spermatozoa in sows. Reproduction, 122, 289-296. PMID:11467980.

Mezalira A., Dallanora D., Bernardi L.M., Wentz I., Bortolozzo F.P. 2005. Influence of sperm cell dose and post-insemination backflow on reproductive performance of intrauterine inseminated sows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 40:1-5.

Petrujkić T., Bojkovski J., Petrujkić B. 2011. Reprodukcija svinja, Naučni institut za veterinarstvo, Beograd

Pelland C., Cassar G., Kirkwood R., Friendship R. 2008. Fertility after intrauterine insemination with conventional or low numbers of spermatozoa in sows with synchronized ovulation. Journal of Swine Health and Reproduction, 16:188-192.

van den Berg B.M., Reesink J., Reesink W. 2014. TRIXcell+, a new long-term boar semen extender containing whey protein with higher preservation capacity and litter size. Open veterinary journal, 4:20-25.

Waberski D., Meding S., Dirksen G., Weitze K.F., Leiding C., Hahn R. 1994. Fertility of long-term-stored boar semen: Influence of extender (Androhep and Kiev), storage time and plasma droplets in the semen. Animal Reproduction Science, 36:145-151.

Watson P.F., Behan J.R. 2002. Intrauterine insemination of sows with reduced sperm numbers: result of a commercially based field trial. Theriogenology, 57:1683-1693.

Most read articles by the same author(s)