Trends in the top ten popular dog breeds in Serbia (2008–2022)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Information on the prevalence of the most popular breeds within one society can provide insights into its sociological, economic, and anthropological aspects, while also aiding in the organization of more effective veterinary services and improving animal welfare. This research aimed to determine whether there has been a change in dog breed ownership between the Serbian capital city, Belgrade (BG), and non-Belgrade (non-BG) regions over the last 15 years, for three five-year periods: 2008–2012, 2013–2017, and 2018–2022. Data on breed prevalence were collected from the official Vetup database of the Republic of Serbia. Mixed-breed dogs were the most prevalent in both BG and non-BG regions across all three periods, though their percentage has declined in the most recent period relative to purebred dogs. In the first period, large working/guardian breeds dominated in all regions. German Shepherds consistently ranked as the most prevalent purebred dogs across all periods and regions. In contrast, Maltese dogs emerged as the most prevalent breed in Belgrade during the two most recent periods. In 2013–2017, other small breeds began to emerge, and in the third period, they dominated the BG region, while larger breeds remained more common in non-BG regions. These changes may reflect lifestyle changes and urban preferences for smaller breeds better suited to apartment living. These trends reflect dog ownership preferences, shaped by lifestyle changes and socio-economic factors in urban and rural areas, while also aligning with global patterns but probably retaining unique traits of local patterns.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media. Articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).
References
Ekenstedt, K. J., Crosse, K. R., Risselada, M. 2020. Canine Brachycephaly: Anatomy, Pathology, Genetics and Welfare. Journal of Comparative Pathology, 176:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2020.02.008.
Fallahi, M., Masoudi, A. A., Vaez Torshizi, R., Maghsoudi, A. 2024. Socio-economic evaluation of human-dog coexistence: A 40,000 years history. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 10(6):e70012. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70012.
Herzog, H. 2006. Forty-two thousand and one Dalmatians: Fads, social contagion, and dog breed popularity. Society & Animals, 14(4):383–397. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853006778882448.
Kogan, L. R., Packman, W., Erdman, P., Currin-McCulloch, J., Bussolari, C. 2022. US Adults’ Perceptions of Dog Breed Bans, Dog Aggression and Breed-Specific Laws. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16):10138. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610138.
Kogan, L. R., Schoenfeld-Tacher, R. M., Hellyer, P. W., Oxley, J. A., Rishniw, M. 2019. Small Animal Veterinarians’ Perceptions, Experiences, and Views of Common Dog Breeds, Dog Aggression, and Breed-Specific Laws in the United States. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(21):4081. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214081.
O’Neill, D. G., McMillan, K. M., Church, D. B., Brodbelt, D. C. 2023. Dog breeds and conformations in the UK in 2019: VetCompass canine demography and some consequent welfare implications. PLoS ONE, 18(7):e0288081. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288081.
Packer, R. M. A., O’Neill, D. G., Fletcher, F., Farnworth, M. J. 2020. Come for the looks, stay for the personality? A mixed methods investigation of reacquisition and owner recommendation of Bulldogs, French Bulldogs and Pugs. PLoS ONE, 15(8):e0237276. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237276.
Paul, E. S., Coombe, E. R., Neville V. 2022. Online Dog Sale Advertisements Indicate Popularity of Welfare-Compromised Breeds. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 27(4):702–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2022.2147008.
Sandøe, P., Kondrup, S. V., Bennett, P. C., Forkman, B., Meyer, I., Proschowsky, H. F., Serpell, J. A., Lund, T. B. 2017. Why do people buy dogs with potential welfare problems related to extreme conformation and inherited disease? A representative study of Danish owners of four small dog breeds. PLoS ONE, 12(2):e0172091. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172091.
Turcsán, B., Miklósi, Á., Kubinyi, E. 2017. Owner perceived differences between mixed-breed and purebred dogs. PloS ONE, 12(2), e0172720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172720.
Vučinić, M., Vučićević, M. 2019. Children are victims of dog bites due to irresponsible dog ownership, parenthood, and managers of school institutions in Serbia. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 30, 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.12.005.
AKC. American Kennel Club. Available at: https://www.akc.org. Accessed 03.10.2024.
FCI. Federation Cynologique International. Available at: https://www.fci.be/en/Nomenclature/Default.aspx. Accessed 26.09.2024.
PISRS. Pravno informacioni sistem Republike Srbije. Available at: https://pravno-informacioni-sistem.rs/eli/rep/sgrs/ministarstva/pravilnik/2012/23/4. Accessed 26.09.2024.
SORS. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. Available at: https://www.stat.gov.rs. Accessed 26.09.2024.
TGMResearch. Available at: https://tgmresearch.com/. Accessed 02.10.2024.
Vetup. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy of the Republic of Serbia. Available at: https://vetup.vet.minpolj.gov.rs/. Accessed 26.09.2024.